The Library at Night (2006) by Alberto Mangual

The Library at Night (2006) by Alberto Mangual

GoodReads meta-data is 373 pages rated 3.99 by 3,333 litizens.

Genre: Bibliomania.

Verdict: Ruminative.

While converting a French barn into his private library Mangual thinks about libraries, books, and readers.  Alberto Mangual, Argentine born, is a cosmopolitan writer, editor, translator, and — most of all — reader.  How will he house his 35,000 books?  What kind of shelving is best?  Should the shelves be enclosed against dust and light?  If so, can he afford that?  Where will the readers go for e-books? How will the books be arrayed on the shelf?  Each of these and many other practical questions sent him to the books for answers reaching back beyond the fabled library at Alexandria and forward past the internet.  

By the way, Alberto, I recommend Henry Petroski, The Book on the Bookshelf (2010), mainly about bookshelves and shelving.  

The chapter titles all have the same stem:  The Library as ….

  • Myth
  • Order
  • Space
  • Power
  • Shadow
  • Chance
  • Workshop
  • Mind 
  • Island
  • Survival, and finally 
  • Home

The insights are many and the prose is textured but supple.  Savour a few passages with me.

  1. ‘The Alexandria Library that wanted to be the storehouse for the memory of the world was not able to secure the memory of itself.’ Now we know very little about it.  
  2. A satire from the third century BC refers to the in habitants of that library at Alexandria in this way: ‘A horde of well-fed scribblers constantly squabbling among themselves in the cage.’  Universities it seems have a long history.
  3. ‘The ancient dead who rise from books to speak to us.’
  4. A book on papyrus has lasted longer than any book on a digital media.  Indeed CDs decay after little more than a decade, despite the claims of manufacturers, even if one still has the device to play them.  
  5. The universal library is the world itself.
  6. In the Koran we read that ‘one scholar is more powerful against the Devil than a thousand worshippers.’
  7. Every person’s library is autobiographical.
  8. In my mental library many books are reduced to a few remembered lines. By the way, his mental library also includes all the library books he has borrowed to read.  
  9. We can imagine the books we’d like to read though they have not (yet) been written.
  10. Reading was once considered useful and important, then become at times dangerous and subversive, and now is condescendingly accepted as a pastime for others [by those who do not have time to read]. (Corollary: No one has the time to do something they regard as unimportant, and everyone has the time to do the things they think are important.)  
  11. He might have added this thought from me:  there is no book so dreadful that some idiot on GoodReads scores it a 4+ and praises it.  

It is all trip and no arrival, though there is a subsequent, similar book by Mangual called Packing My Library (2018) when it came time to move that carefully wrought Barn Library.  It is much shorter and perhaps I will continue with it. 

Alberto Mangual

He does say something about organising the books by language which is overridden by content in some cases, e.g., all the krimis are together.  But he does not discuss the systems libraries use from Dewey on, nor does he mention the software now available for private libraries such as I use – Book Collector.  Zip on cataloguing or shelving, yet these are the gears of most libraries.  

The Hound of the Baskervilles (1988)

The Hound of the Baskervilles (1988)

IMDb meta-data is runtime 1 hour and 45 minutes, rated 8.0 by 4727 cinematizens.  

Genre: Sherlockiana.

Verdict: Inert.

The Granada Television production of the Holmes Cannon from 1984 to 1996 was heralded as complete and faithful to the originals in forty-one instalments. (It was thus not complete with seventeen remaining.)  It is certainly true in this case that the screenplay seems to follow the text with few cinematographic additions.  Conan Doyle may have been honoured by such fidelity, but as a viewer he would have noticed how mechanical is the result.  While on paper the reader suspends disbelief and there is movement in the narrative, on the screen it seems episodic, or worse, a sequence of still-lifes to display the period furnishing and costumes and not much else. N.B. that the story was written in episodes as a serial and it shows in this production. 

None of the supporting characters are developed though the ingenue performance of Dr Mortimer with his dog is good it seems out of place.  How could that young man had not have noticed Miss Stapleton until the heir came on the scene. Moreover, he does not capitalise on the great line about the footprint for the Sherlockians. It comes out nearly as an afterthought. I blame the director for that, not the actor. And how is it that this pet dog offers no clue to the hound?  

Neither Miss Stapleton nor her sinister brother/husband gets much chance to perform.  She looks confused most of the time and I guess that is in character but it got to be monotonous and he looks perplexed, not the mercurial charmer he can be made.  

Likewise, the blustering litigator is a cipher despite the actor’s bellowing, though the role of his daughter is restored to its rightful place in the story.  (She is usually omitted.)  

But most of all, THE MOOR is rendered null and void. What the camera could do with it is left out in favour of the text, and that is a great shame.  The 2002 version with Richard Roxborough in the lead does a superb job of making THE MOOR the dominant character in events, even more than the Hound.  

Edward Hardwicke offers Dr John Watson as a mature, capable albeit literal-minded man who warms himself in the reflected glory of Holmes.  While Jeremy Brett as Holmes was wonderful in the first episodes in this series. British born and bred, yet he was a new face to Brit telly, having lived and worked in Canada and the USA, and he obviously relished playing one of the most enduring British icons, but here he seems off-colour, though perhaps I am biased by knowing the hell he went through in his private life about this time.  Ghouls may read about that trial on their own time.  His career (and his life) drew to a close shortly after this interrupted and incomplete series ended.  

Viewers at the time might have just seen a version of The Hound from 1983 with Ian Richardson in the lead. Stay tuned for my trenchant comments on that in due course. 

The Cat of Baskervilles (2018) by Vicki Delany

The Cat of Baskervilles (2018) by Vicki Delany

GoodReads meta-data is 309 pages, rated 3.96 by 1395 litizens.  

Genre: VIG (Vogue + IKEAA + Gourmet) does not a krimi make.

Verdict:  Zzzzzzz

I took the plunge and persisted because of the cute title but found page after page of description of clothes, furniture, and food, giving up at 25% of the catalogue per the Kindle because little of interest had happened among all that padding. There was no development in the characters or the plot but the surface of Vogue + IKEAA + Gourmet.  Marching through an IKEA maze would be more challenging and interesting than reading on, so I quit.  Be warned.  

For some time I did not bother to write notes about books I put aside, but then found I returned to them by mistake.  I might be tempted again by this cute title unless I remembered it (or had notes on it in the Book Collector app) so I started to write notes, and once written to post them.    

Sherlock Holmes and the Red Demon (2001) by Larry Millet

Sherlock Holmes and the Red Demon (2001) by Larry Millet 

GoodReads meta-data is 404 pages rated 4.04 by 1552 litizens.  

Genre: Sherlockiana

Verdict:  Elemental.  

In the dry summer pine forests of deepest Minnesota fire is an ever present danger compounded by the sparks flying from railroad trains owned by Robber Baron J. J. Hill.  Meanwhile, Eugene Debs has been organising railway men into unions hostile to Hill.  Trouble is brewing.  

A new ingredient comes to this combustible mix when Hill begins to receive threatening letters signed by the Red Demon which promise ruin to the businessman.  While having the character of blackmail threats, strangely the letters do not demand money. This is a new one for Hill.  

When pursuing these letters his own trusted investigator disappears, Hill goes to the top of the tree by sending an agent to recruit Mr Sherlock Holmes of 221B Baker Street, London SW.  Hill offers a princely sum for Holmes’s services who he is more intrigued by the the situation than attracted by the dosh.  He and Watson set sail for the new world and then take the train to the NorthWest frontier of St Paul. 

There follows a lengthy game of cat-and-mouse in the later 19th Century woods of Minnesota with much detail about railroads, engines, tracks, switches, flying sparks and embers, trestles, telegraphs keys and posts, along with the axe men who live among the pines.  Holmes and Watson pose as London Times journalists doing research for a feature piece on rough-hewn ways of life in the north woods.  As if.  

They discover a cast of characters among the rustics, which includes a retarded sheriff, a clever brothel madame, a prissy woodsman, a flannel-shirted thug, a skeptical newspaper editor, while Holmes and Watson consume vast American servings of food.  It comes to a head when the summer drought makes a perfect fire storm.  

Larry Millet

The text has footnotes relating to the Holmes cannon, and the historic events upon which the story is based. The telling is all rather theatrical as though the book aspired to being a screen play and much of Holmes’s work seemed pointless to this reader.  Still it is diverting.  

This is the first of a series.  

The Burgas Affair (2017) by Ellis Shuman

The Burgas Affair (2017) by Ellis Shuman  

GoodReads meta-data is 327 pages rated 4.0 by 48 litizens.  

Genre: krimi.

Verdict: [Grrrr.]

A bus loaded with Israeli tourists in Bulgaria is bombed on the way to a Black Sea coastal resort.  A joint Israeli-Bulgarian investigation follows.  Sort of…

A Bulgarian detective who is a man’s man, constantly smoking, drinking, and cursing, and having a pissing contest with every other man he meets, is half of one team; the other is a Mossad data analyst who has never been in the field before, but her father came from Bulgaria and she has a smattering of the language. The set-up is promising, combining spreadsheets with head banging.  

What follows is a disjointed series of backstories, punctuated by Man’s Man clumsy efforts to rape/seduce the Israeli who proves resistant to his crude efforts.  None of it is played for laughs, and we all know that in time she will relent because he is, after all, a man’s man.  The clichés abound without any substance.  Blind Freddy spotted the mole about two hundred pages before Man’s-Man did.  

Nor is the Israeli any better.  After riding for several hours in a car just as bored as the reader is, she is asked to drive for a while, and after taking the driver’s seat goes ballistic to find the car has a stick shift and not an automatic transmission.  Was she asleep for the preceding four hours when they drove down the road that she didn’t notice the gear changes up and down the hills of eastern Bulgaria with her single companion driving. And she is an intelligence analyst. Doh! (Don’t blame her, she is written that way.)

Much is made of identifying the bomber in the first half of the book and then this theme disappears.  Evidently it did not really matter that much. It seems there was little reason to follow the trail.  

There is some to’ing and fro’ing in Bulgaria and I preferred that travelogue to listening to that man’s man feel sorry for himself.  What a snowflake! Nor is the Israeli any more interesting.  A five-second scan of the reviews on GoodReads reminded me why I never bother to do that.  

Ellis Shuman

The mechanical Turk alerted me to this title after I read a concise history of Bulgaria.  I tried the sample and found it not to my taste but assuming there were not many Bulgarian krimis in English and this might be the only one to hand, even the best one, I persisted.  Grrr, as above. 

l Came as a Shadow (2020) by John Thompson

l Came as a Shadow (2020) by John Thompson

GoodReads meta-data is 352 pages, rated 4.78 by 27 litizens.   

Genre: Autobiography.

Coach Thompson is a legend and it is easy to see why.  This man is a straight-shooter with a fast draw.  He transformed the Georgetown Hoyas from also rans to leaders with dozens of titles and trophies and what is more important, and singular, 97% of his players graduated.  Coach was an educator on and off the court.  

It is a long gruelling story of racism as Coach learned the games behind the game, and he learned them well.  Among his teachers were Red Auerbach who saw this gangly youth in a pick-up game on a playground one summer and encouraged him to stay in the game.  Coach later played two season with the Celts as back-up to Bill Russell, giving Coach plenty of time to study the game, front and back.  (Bill never sat down.) 

But most of all there were his parents whom he wanted to make proud of himself, and so he worked at it. Did he ever! The towel on his shoulder became a signature.  It reminded him that his parents spent their lives working 60 or more hours a week cleaning up behind white people so he could better himself, and when he said that in an interview a storm of angry protest broke with the Pox News haters who regarded it as a provocative remark. In another of his trademarks, he shrugged and repeated it, because after all it was true.  But as we know truth has no value to Pox News.  

In one telling passage he takes a list of examples of things coaches do, like arguing with officials, defending players before the media vultures, benching players, and shows how such actions are reported when a white coach does them, and when a black coach does them.  When he argues a ref’s call a white coach is feisty, when a black coach argues he is intimidating; when a white coach defends a player he is fair and a black coach who does that is stubborn; in benching a player a white coach is disciplined and a black coach is angry; and so on. Some of the examples can be found in 2020, by the way.

When he started recruiting for the Hoyas at Georgetown he often went after unschooled athletes that were regarded as high risk by other colleges, including at least two with prison records to whom he gave a second chance. As long as they kept their grades up to graduate, he guaranteed their scholarships even if they did not make the team. This arrangement so impressed parents that they drove their boys to take it and to make the team to pay off the implicit debt. Rival coaches were not sure if this was madness or underhanded, and made a fuss about it both ways. One of those second-chances was AI. The cognoscenti will get The Answer. The fine upstanding white young men who played against AI taunted him as a jailbird. Yep.  [Swish.]  AI always had the last laugh.  

Hard though it is for this cynic to believe, the University administration stood behind Coach even when his teams lost, and he was burned in effigy, labeled ‘nigger,’ on campus.  On other occasions his university office was ransacked with a message for this African boy to go home!  Need I say it, Georgetown University is Catholic school and a bastion of the liberal elite, and yet scratch the surface and there it is.  

He himself had been cut from the Olympic team because of the unspoken quota on black players, and he knew it.  This is one of the reasons why he was never grateful for his accomplishments.  He had earned them, and he knew others had also done so but were denied them by unseen, unspoken, unbreakable racial quotas.  

One observer (Michael Jordan) called him the Aristotle of basketball for his training of kings of the court. Coach thought of himself as a teacher who used a basketball to instruct in the use of one’s talents, in teamwork, in courtesy, in civility, in responsibility, in the value of education…..in the Georgetown way, never back down and always applaud an opponent’s well-earned victory.        

I have always liked Patrick Ewing, and now I know why.  Surely the best NBA center never to make it to a final. This is the coach that channeled the Van Gogh of basketball, Allen Iverson, into a productive career without parallel.  

The Answer.

Coach has some choice words for that old chestnut that blacks have biological superiority as athletes, too, seeing in it yet another way to belittle the accomplishments of blacks. He attributes the success of black athletes to intelligence and a drive to succeed, and the ability to succeed where there are fewer racial barriers, sports being one of the domains where the barriers are lowest these days.          

The janitors, laundrymen, ballboys, porters, ushers, maids, attendants, security officers, and doormen at hotels and arenas all welcomed his teams because the players said ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ and never left a mess for someone else’s mom and dad to clean up.  A player who violated such norms of courtesy and civility would find himself with his 21-point scoring average on the bench until he learned that 70% of Hoya basketball was off the court.  

John Thompson was the first Division I coach to hire an academic advisor for the team, a woman.  He then hired a trainer, a woman, whom he promoted to assistant coach so that she could sit on the bench in games (and also get on a higher pay grade), readily available for injuries.  Both appointments threw the NCAA into a frenzy trying to find rules to block such changes since both were white women it also set off a media feeding frenzy.  Use your imaginations just a like a Pox journalist. Both these women worked for Coach for many years.  

Hoya scheduling had been historic. Every year was the same as last year.  No more when Coach came on the scene. He wanted to play arch rivals at home, or not at all.  (And if these rivals refused to schedule at Georgetown, he leaked it to the press to embarrass the rivals.) He wanted to play and beat teams that dominated post season tournaments in early season games. He also wanted a better gymnasium for his team(s) and fill it with shouting fans.  To further these ends he engaged in an infinity of negotiations in the games behind the game. He seldom compromised, and that got him the reputation as a trouble-maker, but he noticed white coaches were seldom asked to compromise and he stuck to his guns.   

Then there is the deflated basketball he kept on his desk about the other 70%, but, well, read the book. The title is explained on the last page, but I didn’t get it.  

Coach admits his many mistakes, civil, social, and tactical, and hands out praise to many who worked with the Hoya teams.  The telling is episodic marked by basketball seasons.  In that respect it is not easy to read though the ghostwriter’s prose is smooth.  

Coach with Patrick Ewing, lately his successor at Georgetown.

Recent news from GT suggests things have gotten worse in subsequent days. Autobiography is never a completely reliable source, to be sure.

The Hound of the Baskervilles (1983)

The Hound of the Baskervilles (1984)

IMDb meta-data is runtime 1 hour and 45 minutes, rated 8.0 by 4727 cinematizens.  

Genre: Sherlockiana.

Verdict: Inert.

Hound of the Baskervilles (1983)  

IMDb mea-data is runtime 1 hour and 40 minutes, rated 6.6 by 1129 cinematizens.  

Genre: Sherlockiana.

Verdict: Foggy.

The Hound gets another workout in this misty production with little to remember from it. 

Ian Richardson as Holmes is condescending and superior.  Donald Churchill plays Watson as Nigel Bruce without the avuncular charm.  Brian Blessed injects some energy into a still life of a movie.  

The major characters of The Moor and The Hound are obscured by the fog machine run amok.   

But notice this, in Holmes’ study at Baker Street 221B there hangs on the wall near the door a picture that seems to be of a Turk in uniform.  A very similar picture is to be seen in many episodes of the Jeremy Brett productions, including that of the Hound of 1988.  I found myself more interested in this coincidence than in the narrative.  


The Listening Wall (1959) by Margaret Millar

The Listening Wall (1959) by Margaret Millar

GoodReads meta-data is 236 pages rated 3.83 by 220 litizens.

Genre: krimi

Verdict: ingenious but talky.  

Setup: two mismatched women from San Francisco, one reticent and hesitant, the other assertive and aggressive, take a holiday together in Mexico City where one of them dies.  Well, yes, dies, but was it an accident, a suicide, or a murder. If the latter, who dun it?  If suicide, why dun it? If accident, how come? These are the questions around which the plot unwinds.   

The plot thickens when after this ordeal, the survivor returns home to San Francisco only to disappear almost immediately.  Her husband says she has gone east to recover from the trauma while he has to stay in Bay City to work.

Hmmm.  The missing woman’s brother never liked the husband and finds gaps in this story, hiring a gumshoe to investigate, who also finds gaps but is less inclined to leap to conclusions than the brother who by now has bought a gun.

It all started in the Mexico City hotel room and the action returns there in the end to a rather convoluted conclusion that is typical of the psychological interiors Millar so expertly explored. I did not find the villain entirely credible or even worth the bother, but it ties up the title nicely.  

Millar’s books won many awards, and it is easy to see why. The prose is effortless (and I can only guess how hard it is to achieve that) and the insights into the minds of the characters are surgically judicious. Even though I did not invest in any of the characters, they offer an array of different people and the motivations of each are, well, distinctive and credible.  Millar also has an eye for the telling detail to make Sherlock Holmes take note. Not a cardboard plot device among them.  Except possibly the villain, though much space is expended trying to round out the villain’s character without success for this reader.   

Margaret Millar

In 1965 Millar received the ‘Woman of the Year Silver Cup’ of the Los Angeles Times.  During its existence between 1950 and until the endowment ran out in 1977 the award was presented to almost 300 women to honour achievements in science, religion, the arts, education and government, community service, entertainment, sports, business, and industry.  Other recipients include Lily Tomlin, Irene Dunn, and Anäis Nin. 

Cloak without Dagger (1956)

Cloak without Dagger (1956)

IMDb meta-data is runtime of 1 hour and 9 minutes, rated 5.6 by 126 cinematizens.

Genre: Spy

Verdict: energetic

Post war a woman sees a man she encountered during the war and knows to be a spy.  Impetuously she sets out to tackle him with the subtlety of sledgehammer.  She is aided by a hotel house detective who is comic relief, well, comic anyway, and also a former boyfriend counter spy. The boyfriend is too good to be true, but is. 

Cuthebertson

The spy is after the plans — is it always plans? — of an atomic-powered tank, which mercifully we never see.  Ever reliable West Australian Allan Cuthbertson plays a by-the-book soldier toward the end. Cuthbertson had served the RAAF during the war in Air Sea Rescue in the Solomon Islands and New Guinea campaigns. After that playing solider must have been a lark.   

I rather hoped the title indicated a bit more wit than slapstick, but not to be.

Castle Sinister (1948)

Castle Sinister (1948)

IMDb meta-data is runtime the longest 49 minutes ever recorded, rated an astounding 3.6 by 137 monkeys at keyboards.

Genre:  Old Dark House.

Verdict: Fail.

In a remote, suitably gloomy Scots castle our cast gathers to read the script with growing disbelief.  Because most of the chaps are in uniform it must be wartime, but you’d hardly know from the dialogue.

Soon enough the number of guests at Castle Gloom decreases and the simple working class retainers blame the Phantom, which is never explained, but we do see someone lurking about in a robe and cowl with a skeleton mask waiting for Halloween.  

Danger Man is unavailable so this is a case for oxymoronic Army Intelligence. There is a confused and confusing love interest, an immature boy-soldier, a dour laird, an aloof and icy ladyship, and all those uniforms. With a touch of realism the AI investigator spends all his time in the local pub.  

Phantom lurks.

Turns out one of the uniforms is a Nasty Spy who is – sit down and take a deep breath – the father of the youngest son. Wait, father!  How did that happen?  [In the usual way.]  And the son has in his possession secret plans for deep-fried Mars bars!  The Scots’ secret weapon!  

It gets worse. Much of the dialogue is spoken by the actors with their backs to the camera.  This is a technique that makes expensive synchronisation between audio and video unnecessary. When it is not used, it is apparent that the dialogue is indeed out of synchronisation. 

Released on 19 February 1948 with a thud, even as a quota quickie this must have been shelved.  None of the players is noted for anything else on the IMDb. Most of them have but a few credits and for several this is the only one.  Good career move. Quit.   

About half the run time is distance shots of the exterior of the heap and some murky interiors.  Dashed were my hopes for an Old Dark House with secret passages, cobwebs, sliding panels, spring loaded walls, and spy holes.  

Not to be mistaken for the lost 1932 film of the same title, though losing this one would be a service.