Castle to Castle (1957) by Louis-Ferdinand Céline

GoodReads meta-data is 362 pages, rated 3.81 by 997 litizens.

Genre: Autobiography.

Verdict:  ….ellipses…, indeed!

Louis-Ferdinand Céline

In a southeast corner of Bavaria is the small town (population 17,000 in 2018) of Sigmaringen, which had been the seat of the principality of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen until 1850, there is a castle befitting that status. The town has since remained the personal property of the Hohenzollern family. Fascinating, uh?  

In September 1944 the castle became home to the remnant of the Vichy government in exile, one of the more bizarre twists of fate in World War II.  More than a thousand people, including Maréchal Phillip Pétain, President of the council of the Vichy government and his prime minister, Fernand de Brinon were trucked out of Vichy and ensconced in and around that Hohenzollern Castle at Sigmaringen.  The others were Vichy loyalists, officials, army officers, clerks, ministers, telephonists, typists, janitors, archivists, aides, butlers, factotums, secretaries, churchmen, sycophants, diplomats, hangers-on, however, initially there were few of the French fascist zealots from Paris who were left to fend for themselves.  Along with the loyalists went their families and retainers. This castle would qualify as an Old Dark House with dungeons, hidden doors, spy holes, caves, secret passages, bricked up passage ways, concealed rooms, and the ghosts of Hohenzollerns past.  In residence was the last Hohenzollern princess who occasionally appeared from her private apartment.  

This crew was officially known as – get this – first as la Commission gouvernementale de Sigmaringen, which was changed a few days later to la Délégation gouvernementale française pour la défense des intérêts français en Allemagne, and then la Commission gouvernementale française pour la défense des intérêts nationaux. Even in 1944, even in extremis managers reorganise and rename to justify their existence, it would seem.  Whatever the nomenclature, it was the government in exile of Vichy France until April 1945.  By a personal order from Hitler, the Castle and its environs were designated a French enclave ruled by the aforementioned government in exile.  

Now why Hitler would bother with this lot is another question, perhaps for Indy Neidell one day.  Hitler had rescued Mussolini and set him up with a rump government at Salo, yes, true, but that made some sense in that the Salo government kept order in northern Italy behind German lines. The Sigmaringen government had nothing to order but itself for the seven months of its tenuous existence. One speculation is that the Vichy Government, house of cards though it was, was kept intact so that should the the tide of war change it could be quickly re-installed. Chalk that up to optimism.  

Neither Pétain nor Pierre Laval, for though deposed as prime minister the latter remained a power behind the throne, or so he thought, wanted to leave France, though what their fate would be if they remained requires no imagination, yet possibly both these men were so deluded they alone would have been surprised by the lynch mob.  The solution was to make the enclave French territory on the model of an embassy.  This German legal fiction was grudgingly accepted by the Vichy loyalists. Hence both Laval and Pétain could say they had not left French territory while in that castle in Germany.  Look up legal fiction for details. 

Meanwhile, some of those zealots who had fled from Paris joined the group.  This was not a homogeneous lot.  The zealots from Paris had long criticised the Vichy government for its sloth, incompetence, semitism, fashion sense, defeatism, and lack of commitment to the cause of fascism, failure to retain the French Empire, and poor grammar.  Parisien leaders of factions, cults, and publicists put themselves forward at this eleventh and dark hour as alternative governments to the Germans in this city-state of one thousand damned souls. These rivalries are partly reflected in the name changes noted above, as the splinter groups of a few dozen jockeyed for position. The Germans had no interest in rocking the already sinking boat and stuck with the Vichy comedy.

Among the number in the castle were the medical doctor and novelist Céline, Lucette, his wife, and Bébert, their cat, and later in 1957 desperate to make a living, he penned this screed about those dying days.  It consists of his well known ellipses in stream of consciousness. It seems to this reader it was published only because it had Céline’s name on it. After the war he had been judged a traitor and suffered national denigration for his collaboration. That denigration meant he was excluded from social services and even could not ride public transport.  To see a doctor, to buy a metro ticket in those days one had to show the carte d’identité, and his card was marked.  But he had been a celebrated novelist and his postwar notoriety, perhaps, added to the caché of the book, or so the publisher may have estimated.  

A page of his text shows the ellipsis.

The Vichy French flag flew over the Castle, a newspaper of sorts was produced, a radio station was set up but seldom had enough electricity to broadcast, and some other accoutrements of a state, like – believe it or not – postage stamps were designed. The file clerks filed; the typists typed; the factotums factoted. There were also three foreign ambassadors in attendance, Italian, Japanese, and German. And it had its own army, a gang of the dreaded Milice. However, the aged Maréchal, who was well over eighty years old by this time, went into a sulk and refused to participate in this last charade.  

Food was scarce, aerial bombardment an ever-present threat, drinking water often contaminated, the German-uniformed (mostly Croat) guards were warders who made sure none of their charges left, and they, too, were anxious. The more desperate the circumstances the more the exiles turned on each other. Leading the way, Céline shrilly denouncing them all as Jews. 

News of the Christmas Nazi Ardennes offensive, rumours of Nazi secret weapons all gave hope to these desperate and despicable people, but the reality of no food, no paper, no wine, no soap, no fuel for heat, no hot water, no drugs, no clean bandages, no socks, no thread to mend ripped clothing, no nothing was crushing.   

As Free French forces approached, Pétain and Laval and few others in their retinue fled into Switzerland.  (Some sources say the French Free army was slowed to allow the inmates to escape as the Free French had no desire to deal with them.)  Once in Switzerland Pétain demanded that he be returned to France and he was, while Laval demanded asylum in Switzerland which was denied and he, too, was returned to France. Meanwhile back at the castle the German-Croat guards disappeared as the Free French rolled in and bagged the remainder, though in the confusion a few individuals escaped to Italy. 

The book is sprinkled with hindsight and it was all written well after the fact. Céline did not keep a diary, though he did practice medicine among the exiles and kept notes for that.  

It is a story reminiscent of that other, smaller castle crew at Château Itter (Austria) where from 1940 the Germans held as hostages to fortune French officials of the Third Republic. Among them were former prime ministers Éduoard Daladier, who had sat in a numb silence at Munich, and Paul Reynaud, who in 1940 had wanted to continue the fight from Algeria, former Vichy cabinet minister Jean Borotera who resisted Vichy’s anti-semitism, and Generals Maurice Gamelin and Maxime Weygand, along with politicians Andre François-Poncet, Michel Clemenceau, and Albert Lebrun, as well as one of Charles de Gaulle’s sisters, and a few others totalling perhaps thirty. LeBrun had been the President of the Senate who had authorised Pétain to sound out the Germans about terms and was then surprised when Pétain used the commission to surrender without attempting negotiation.    

There would have been no love lost among these people.  Gamelin and Weygand were each at work on memoirs blaming the other for the Defeat, as were Daladier and Reynaud. Léon Blum, another one-time prime minister was not here, because Vichy officials had in mind a show trial to blame him for anything and everything, and kept him apart.  The Itter was liberated in late 1944.  

But let’s not forget that the most significant hostages to fortune that the Nazis had, namely, a million plus French prisoners of war, working as slave labor in German war industries and on farms.  In addition to these unfortunates, there were also as many as another million French citizens sent to Germany as forced labor by the Service du Travail Obligatoire (STO). The Vichy Regime made little effort to secure the release of the POWs or to stymie the STO.  Indeed, as to the latter, sometimes it sent more conscripts than ordered by the Nazis to show how enthusiastic it was. In addition the production of millions of others in France was harvested and sent to Germany. 

N.B. In 1941 the Vichy Regime did try to negotiate a return of prisoners by offering German unlimited access to Syria and Lebanon. This was attractive to Germany as a threat both to the Suez Canal and the Iraq oil fields.  It took the Allied conquest of the Levant (in which Australians participated) to block that move. NSW Governor Roden Cutler had his leg shot off there.  

Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea (2000) by Charles Seife.

GoodReads meta-data is 248 pages, rated 3.96 by 8432 litizens.   

Verdict: Nada, nil, zilch, zip, nada, goose egg,…. 

This is a book about nothing and how important it is.  Get that, and get it straight!  Lear was right about nothing. Something times nothing is nothing.  See?  Yet nothing is always with us.  

Babylonians with their sixty-based number system counted with abaci and started to use a space holder(s) to distinguish 1 on the first line from 10 on the second from 100 on the third, etc. They used slashes (/) to indicate the next line so 1 is 1, 1/ is 10, 1// is 100/,etc.  Thus, like the numbers, zero came from the East to the West, and some of that passage was vexed.  

Arabic numbers, derived from India, combined with zero (0) are much more efficient and effective than Roman numerals.  Ever tried multiplying Roman numerals? Long division? Even writing them down shows that: Arabic 678 is Roman DCLXXVIII.  And because there are fewer characters the margin of error in transcription is reduced.  Plus the Arabic numbers are more distinctive one from another than the numerals with fewer inscription errors.  

But nothing, zero, has metaphysical and mystical connotations that disturbed many.  The Pythagoreans regarded it as a sign of the beast or hit-and-run and tried to keep it locked up.  To some zero represented both nothing and everything.  Both ends of that continuum were threatening.  If there was nothing, where was it? Could nothing be anywhere?  

On the other hand, it represent infinity, everything, say in Zeno’s paradox about going half-way to a goal ad infinitum and never getting there.  Once infinity is considered, well, there is a lot of that to think about and our place in it must be pretty small.  

When we are born are we one-year old?  No when were are born we are zero-years old and twelve months later we are one year old.  Everyone, even Republicans, well, maybe, knows that.  But…., what about the calendar?  There was no year zero there: 1 BC and 1 AD are adjacent with no intervening zero, which is one of the many reasons why the calendars of different civilisations vary as they do.  

Zero became a number in India.  When 2, a number, is subtracted from 2, a number, the result is 0 which, being the product of two numbers zero must itself be a number.  Indian mathematicians accepted this logical result sooner and more easily than those to the West who resisted this obvious conclusion with some Olympian mathletics for nearly two millennia.   

When zero (0) was a placeholder as in the Babylonian system it was put to the right of the numbers 1, 2, 3, ….9, and 0.  But when it was promoted to a number it becomes the base 0, 1, 2, 3, …9.  Ah, but that is counterintuitive.  We do not count apples starting with 0 and then 1, and 2.  We have three apples but only count up to 2 if we do, and we don’t (do that). So it went back to the right side of the sequence where it is on keyboards today.  Although in England and Australia the ground floor of a building is in effect zero (0) and the second level is the first floor.  Go figure.  I still stumble over this fact. 

The Indians were so phlegmatic that they also accepted negative numbers. When 3 is subtracted from 2 the result is -1.  This conclusion was resisted to the last ditch in the West even to René Descartes’s day and age.  In his determination to resist the negative, Descartes denigrated such numbers, e.g., the square root of negative number, as imaginary.  See the Wikipedia entry for more mist and fog on the topic. 

What a change since then.  Nowadays everyone brags about Zero Tolerance. 

The vanishing point in art also gets a look in.  (Get it?)  Leonardo was just one artist who saw mathematics in painting perspective.  So does the elliptical orbit of planets from Johannas Kepler.  Wide ranging indeed.  

Then along came set theory, thermodynamics, string theory, a Cepheid variable, the Kelvin scale, the Casimir effect, cosmic Doppler shift, Mack the Knife, the Golden Ratio, and even rational numbers.  For nothing zero has stirred up a lot somethings. Even the Black Hole comes into the equation. Is nothing sacred?  Zero is everywhere and everything!

The book considers everyday examples like the Year Zero above, but also  abstruse mathematics (e.g., projective geometry) , and even more abstruse metaphysics (infinity, as above) that I found it tough going, but, being tough, I kept going. 

Charles Seife

All in all, the book is Much Ado about Nothing.  (Yuk, yuk.)  But surely Jean-Paul gets the last words with his Being and Nothingness.  For the the fraternity brothers, let me explain:  zero is something, so it has being; zero is nothing, so it has nothingness. Sartre could have called his book Zero and been done with it. (Maybe he feared a shelver would get it mixed up with Zorro.)

But wait there is more, the book ends with an appendix in which it is proven that Winston Churchill was a carrot. See for yourself…., if you dare. 

In the Temple of the Muses (1992) of John Robert Maddox’s diverting SPQR series the protagonist Decius encountered an Egyptian mathematician, a woman, who is onto zero and spends all of her time, according to the jaded Decius, talking about nothing when there is much else they could do together that would be something.    

Clovenhoof (2012) by Heidi Goody and Iain Grant.

GoodReads meta-data is 374 pages, rated 3.92 by 2710 litizens. 

Genre: krimi.

Verdict: Whoosh!

It had to happen! McKinsey management has made it to the afterlife, and there, after a 360-degree review accompanied by all the mod clichés of corporate-speak, Satan’s performance has been found unsatisfactory. St Peter has mined the data on his computer tablet and there is no denying the optics of the spreadsheets: things in Hell are bad, but no thanks to Satan. Well, things are so bad many condemned souls cannot even get into Hell so long are the poorly managed entrance lines, but must abandon even that hope. Yet that is one of Satan’s core competencies.    

His KPIs are no longer scalable, indeed, they are no longer visible. No amount of thinking outside the box, colouring outside the lines, corporate values, empowerment, leverage, over the wall(ness), bench-marking, peeling the onion, breaking down the silos, pushing the envelope, increasing the bandwidth, paradigm shifting, data-driving, closing the loop, low-hanging fruit, return on investment, SWOTing, or reaching out can take Hell down to the next level.  When asked if his management of Hell represents best practice, well, what is Satan to say?  Who’s is better?  

After the usual collegial backbiting, some of it literal, Satan appeals this decision because St Peter is sending too many souls to Hell for parking in disabled zones, DVD copying, nose picking, unreturned library books, and the like. But the review committee to hear his appeal, packed with angels unlikely to be sympathetic with the Lord of Darkness, is implacable: Satan is being out-placed.  G-o-n-e.

He is condemned to live on earth as an earthling!  This is, indeed, for him a fate worse than death. Hell is certainly other people, vide Jean-Paul Sartre’s Huis Clos. 

And where is he sent as an alternative to Hell? Birmingham England that is where. A place, it seems, where there is no respect for evil incarnate, and it is forever cold and wet.  

There he adjusts slowly to the new circumstances, and seeks out Satanists to worship himself, but finds them useless poseurs who have never pitch-forked writhing souls into the Lake of Eternal Fire. He’s got nothing to learn from them. Then by chance he finds his métier in Heavy Metal music and for a time is a sin-sation.  But even that grows boring: shouting damnation at dunderheads who pay for the privilege is  fun and profitable but the amusement wanes.  That low boredom threshold may have been his problem in managing Hell.   

In an effort to fit in with his new neighbours Satan prepares a dinner party, like nothing anyone has ever had before.  (Did I mention that he had a part-time job – more of a hobby to remind him of the old days – at a mortuary?)  Then there was the flamethrower, he does like fire, for the crème brulée.  It did not end well.  

In time he discovers his dismissal was rigged in a management coup and finds unlikely allies (including Jeanne d’Arc) to put things back to rights, er, well, wrongs.  

It is a cackle and since there is a murder (followed by a resurrection) it is classified as a krimi above. Well, two of each to be technical. 

Heide Goody and Iain Grant.

When we were planning a trip to Birmingham I found a few novels set in Britain’s second largest city, this among them.  Though that trip was cancelled, by then I had the book sample on the Kindle and when I started reading it, there was no stopping.  It is the first title in a series and I have already finished the second which has more twists and turns than a dean at a budget meeting and started the third in which eternally young and bored Jeanne goes on an away mission.  In the fourth, yes I have read that one, too, we learn where work-weary demons go for a quiet life.  And I am now up to volume seven, ah hmm, eight.  

Charles XII and the Collapse of the Swedish Empire (1899) by Robert Bain.

Genre: Biography

GoodReads meta-data is 235 pages, rated 3.70 by 57 litizens.

Verdict: [Blank]

Charles XII in a Stockholm park

Charles XII of Sweden figured in the biography of Peter the Great I read before we travelled to Russia in 2016. That was the first time I had heard of him, but he seemed to be a snow and ice version of Alexander the Great.  From that hostile, secondhand view, as Peter’s nemesis, aside from Charles’s warrior prowess, what was remarkable was that Sweden remained stable while Charles constantly campaigned.  That stimulated me to find a biography.  I tried samples of The History of Charles XII, King of Sweden (1731) by Voltarie; Charles XII, King of Sweden (2012) by Carl G. Klingspor, and A Warrior Dynasty: The Rise and Decline of Sweden as a Military Superpower (2014) by Henrik Lunde. The scholarly one by Lunde has so much indigestible front matter about sources, acknowledgements, definitions, summaries that the sample ends just as the text begins. Voltaire’s pamphlet is a vehicle to excoriate the barbarian Peter the Great.  Klingspor is hagiography. That left Bain.  

Charles XII (1682-1718) was king of Sweden from age fifteen and made endless war  with Danes, Germans (the Hanseatic League, Saxony, Prussia, Hannover), Poles, Danes, and Russians singly or in alliances.  For the Hansa Stockholm was a backwater that had no business in Baltic commerce (timber, amber, felts and furs). For the Poles, and Poland was a power in this day, Sweden was the protector of hated Protestants and it was, accordingly, god’s work to destroy Swedes.  For the Danes, Sweden had once been a colony in all but name and should stay that. For Russia Sweden blocked access to the Baltic.  

Then there were the outsiders, Catholic France wanted to undermine Protestant Netherlands by weakening its Swedish protector, and Protestant England that wanted to undermine Catholic France by encouraging continental Protestants.  

Got it so far?

Two generations earlier Sweden had intervened in continental religious wars and earned the title of Protector of Protestants.  Sweden then was little more than a geographic expression, however, Swedes, though few in number, proved to be organised, thorough, and committed and so had military success. The artillery helped. Swedish armies were among the first and most proficient at combined arms operations where cavalry, artillery, and infantry co-operated and co-ordinated in attack or defence.  By the time Charles took the field this was old news. 

Once enmeshed in the geo-politics of the region, Sweden could not extricate itself and instead waded in deeper and deeper.  By age fifteen Charles conceived of a Swedish Empire that enveloped the Baltic and drove the hated Danes onto the peninsula shorn of a navy.  Sword in hand he set out to make it so – this became the Great Northern War (1700-1721) that in time drew in the Ukraine, Ottomans, Bulgars, Tatars, Hannover, Prussia, Danes, Saxony, Poland, Cossacks, Tatars, and more. 

When Charles took the throne the Swedish Empire was at its peak, encompassing all modern Sweden, a good chunk of the middle of Norway, all of Finland, the Karelia peninsula some of which is now in Russia, the Baltic islands, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and some of the Polish Baltic coast. There were also two overseas colonies in Delaware in America and in Benin in Africa.  It was a power of its day to rival the Netherlands and England, though not golden Spain nor vast France.  That is, it was a middle power. 

What followed in the reign of Charles XII was continuous war that led to defeat and by 1721 Sweden had shrunk to the borders it now has. He left Sweden spent, depleted, exhausted, and impoverished by his appetite for war with the hordes of Russia, the masses of Poland, the might of the Germans and Prussians, and he never seemed to know when to quit. When adversaries offered favourable peace terms, he spurned them. The comparison to Alexander the Great makes itself. 

Greater Sweden

One historian estimates that one fourth of all men between 20 and 40 years old during his tenure died in war. Nearly every man served in the army at one time, stripping the land of labor in the fields, orchards, ports, markets, tanneries, smiths, and so on.  By his death vast stretches of contemporary Sweden were ghost towns. If young(er) men are away at war for twenty years there are fewer young children.     

King Charles departed Stockholm in 1700 and never returned to that capital.  He spent the remaining twenty-one years of his life mainly with the army on campaign.  Yet with his absence for more than two decades back home Sweden remained stable and willing, if not always able, to supply his financial and human requirements for the army.  Despite his long, and costly absence from Stockholm, there was no usurper, no rebellion by the nobles at the war taxes, no deterioration in the civil administration for lack of funds, no palace coup, no secret deals with the Russians, Poles, or Germans to end the war.  Or so it seems.  That is what I found fascinating when I read about Charles in the biography of Peter the Great.  Regrettably Bain offers no explanation for this remarkable stability in the permanent crisis.  

If Peter the Great had spent twenty-one years away from Moscow there would have been a palace coup and/or an uprising by the nobles in the first six months. French kings seldom travelled further than Versailles, fearing that when absent the nobility would plot even more than it did when the king was present. Elizabeth in England had a secret service actively blocking internal threats to her seat. Alexander had secured his home base with a trusted emeritus general and a small but dedicated palace guard in Macedonia, but nothing like any of that seems to have been the case, or to have been necessary, in Stockholm.

While he was away, he was, in fact, not always with the army.  Here is a quirk of history.  After defeat at what proved to be the last major battle of the Northern War in central Russia, Charles found it impossible geographically to return to Sweden and so he went south on the reasoning that my enemy’s enemy is my friend. He found his way to the Ottoman Empire which sheltered him from the Russians for many years, while he always plotted a return to the battlefield and always urged the Ottomans to strike at Russia. He was there for years, and wore out his welcome.  

When he finally returned north he continued to make war on all comers, and whenever the Senate or Chancellor in Stockholm cried for peace, he sent a stern letter reminding them who was king, and they then dutifully complied to his latest demand for yet more money and yet more men. 

While he was polite in person he had a stubborn streak that had no bounds.  With no political sense he went at everything straight ahead.  Likewise his military tactics consisted of frontal assaults. There was no Napoleonic manoeuvring or artillery preparation. He usually plunged ahead so rapidly that artillery could not keep pace and in some campaigns he dispensed with it altogether. His wars were as destructive as Napoleon’s it is true but there is nothing constructive in his reign as there was in Napoleon’s: schools, laws, reforms, science, bridges, roads, weights and measures, tolerance….  

Charles was nearly as ascetic as any stylite, wearing one uniform until it was bloody rag and then changing to a new one, eating the soldier’s gruel, sleeping on the ground in a Russian winter, and so on. He was usually at the front in combat and that is where he was killed in a meaningless skirmish with Danes.  In these ways he led by example. But he had none of Napoleon’s charm in dealing with the rank and file. He remembered no names, handed out no medals, did not promote individuals for special contributions, offered no pensions, seldom even acknowledged the men as more than tin soldiers.  

In sum, it remains a mystery to me why Swedes put up with this self-destructive man who was willing to take the whole Swedish people with him to the grave.   

The Life and Works of Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis (1924) by Louis-Ferdinand Céline

GoodReads meta-data is 110 pages, rated 3.96 by 324 litizens. 

Genre: Biography (sort of).

Verdict: Wash your hands and fasten your seatbelts.  

Ignaz Semmelweis

Hands up if you know Semmelweis (1818–1865)! He is the man who explained why we should wash our hands. His assiduous research into morbidly rates in maternity hospitals in Vienna led him to the conclusion that infections were transmitted by the hands of the doctors from one patient to another. From that finding he advocated hand washing and more hand washing.  On that subject more in a minute, but first a few words about the book.

The Life and Works of Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis was an eighty-page thesis submitted to meet the requirements of the medical degree Céline earned.  But there is nothing thesis-like about it. An indication of its tone and style hits the reader in the first lines: ‘Mirabeau howled so loudly that Versailles was frightened.  Not since the Fall of the Roman Empire had such a tempest come crashing down upon men…. ‘   This opening passage goes on the characterise the French Revolution as a carnival of blood.  Only three chapters later does Semmelweis appear, well, first his mother appears.   

To return to the story, for that hand-washing advocacy Semmelweis was shunned, ridiculed, demoted, demonised, exiled, and finally driven mad; in the latter state he took his own life by the very infection he had identified.  

Members of the obstetrics profession had long been resigned to high mortality in pregnant women, and accepted it. According to this upstart Semmelweis, doctors themselves caused these deaths!  Ridiculous! Moreover, hand washing was undignified! Hmmph!

The fact that women who gave birth at home, or even on the street, had lower death rates than those who gave birth in all modern-conveniences maternity hospitals was written off as false news.    

John Stuart Mill once opined that if the laws of geometry annoyed Republicans they would immediately declare them false.  (He may not have mentioned Republicans but I got the hint.)  Semmelweis’s intrusion upset a very elaborate and complacent medical establishment and the reaction was to shoot, stab, garrotte, strangle, quarter, and bludgeon the messenger. 

In Paris, Prague, Berlin, and London as well as Vienna the medical profession united against this tiresome interloper and his pages and pages of data.  In truth he was an easy man to reject, being rude and crude; he was quite unwilling to proceed by half-measures.  It was all or nothing for him with the result that it was nothing.  On more that one occasion he barged in the office of a hospital director and berated him about hand washing.  Likewise he burst into wards when doctors were doing the rounds and berated them in front of patients and students. The Austrian emperor at one point exiled him because of these disruptive antics.  

N.B. Semmelweis worked from aggregate data and there is nary a mention of a microscope observing little critters. That came later. What he had was a mass of data that showed a correlation between no hand washing and death.  Reason and evidence are feeble assailants of the fortress of conventional wisdom and it took forty years for Semmelweis to be vindicated, and countless thousands of maternal deaths that soap and water would have prevented.   

All of the above can be gleaned from the Wikipedia entry.  And it bears little resemblance to the book at hand by one of the most remarkable figures in French literature:  Louis Ferdinand Auguste Destouches (1894-1961) who used the nom de plume Céline. He was invalided out of the Army in 1915 with a wound at Ypres.  Later he took a job with the League of Nations in Francophone Africa where he travelled extensively.  Upon returning to France he trained as medical doctor and laboured in the working class districts of Paris where he was seldom paid.  At the time he was a rabid communist only later to because an equally rabid fascist (and energetic anti-Semite) during the war years.  He could be as rude and crude as Semmelweis.  

Dr Destouches

His most famous novel was Journey to the End of Night (1932) about his observations in Africa, followed by Death on Credit (1936) about working class life and death in the slums of Paris.  He wrote in the argot of the people he chronicled and not the stylised prose of the Academy and was thus reviled by the literary establishment for generations. These establishment gatekeepers are now gone and forgotten, while Céline is still in print.   

Declaration of interest:  One of the first reading assignments I had in graduate school concerned Semmelweis and his empirical data.  That is all I can remember but the name stuck because of the association with hand washing.    

The Silver Swan: In Search Doris Duke (2020) by Sallie Bingham.

GoodReads meta-data is 336 pages, rated 2.73 by 11 litizens.

Genre: Biography.

Verdict:  Not found. 

Declaration: I read only the Kindle sample.

We have been to Doris Duke’s (1912–1993) home — Shangri-la — three times, and found it interesting, impressive, intriguing, innovative, and more.  The accounts of the guides and the handouts tell visitors a little about the reclusive DD, but not very much.

When I went looking for more information after our last visit I came across a reference to this forthcoming title, so I signed on for the Kindle sample when it was published.  In due course it popped up on the screen.  

Well, the sample includes the first two chapters which I read to the end.  I am none the wiser about DD.  The chapters I read have neither rhyme nor reason but dart back and forth with the breathlessness of a confused thriller writer.  There is no orderly or organised examination of her origins, nature, nurture, growth, and….    

Even that soft touch, GoodReads, has some stingers about the ‘shambles’ the book is and the endless ‘fluff’ and ‘distractions’ that pad it out. Two chapters was more than enough for me to press Delete. 

This title was published by a very major New York City publisher from which fact draw your own conclusions, Reader. Bingham has published many short stories and other fiction.

Here’s what I already knew:  Mr Duke make money from cigarettes, so much that he founded the eponymous university, Doris was the only child and a fabulously rich heiress who built on Oahu a spectacular all-modern-conveniences house, which has an Arabic water garden and pavilion. She filled the house with  with Islamic decorative art.  During its construction in the 1930s the film Lost Horizons (based on James Hilton’s novel) was current and the builders nicknamed the building Shangri-la; she liked that. Tall, elegant, and rich, this is one of the places where she went for solitude, hiding from the predators. 

In addition to the buildings and the art work, there are also videos of its construction and some of her activities there.  She was a very serious collector and the property also houses an archive documenting and authenticating the collection.  She willed it all to the state of Hawaii to preserve and make public with an endowment of one billion dollars.    

There are entries on Wikipedia that offer a more general account of the Dukes.  

The Corner Shop in Cockleberry Bay (2018) by Nicola May

GoodReads meta-data is 364 pages, rated 4.19 by 17465 litizens. 

Genre: Chick Lit.

Verdict: Flip, flip go the pages.

The narrative arch is a mystery that keeps interest for a while, but the litany of drunks, hangovers, casual sex, and more of the aforementioned soon wore thin. Knit one, purl one, repeat. Fascinating. Not.

The locale offered some interest but on the page it always took second place to the drink and sex.  

Our heroine is given a shop in picturesque Cockleberry by an anonymous benefactor.  That is the overarching mystery.  Who is the giver and why? The shop has been derelict five years (and that gap is never explained within my attention span).  What will our hapless heroine make of it?  (Since we know it is the first of a series, success of some kind is guaranteed.)

Without a shred of self-discipline, numeracy, or much else Heroine makes the shop a success and discovers some true(r) love.  She also discovers who her benefactor is.  My discovery was why some chick lit is not for me.  

Nicola May

It is the first (and for me last) in a series set in picturesque Devon.  The author published this first volume herself and has since made quite a success of the series. So be it.

I seem to recall I went down that way once by train to a PSA conference in Exeter in 1980. The Veil of Ignorance is drawn over any details.  

Attack in the Library (1983) by George Arion

GoodReads meta-data is 208 pages (it seemed like a lot more), rated 3.96 by 120 relatives of the publisher.  

Genre: krimi.

Verdict: slow and steady and slow.

Romanian public intellectual journalist muses on life, and death when late one afternoon with a colossal hangover he finds a dead body has disordered the books in his study – the library of the title. He vaguely recognised the victim as a passing acquaintance. What to do?  

In his befuddled state he concludes that hiding the body in the cellar of the apartment building makes more sense than calling the militia (police).  Sure he is a 98-pound weakling intellectual, lugging around a deadman in the dark of night is the safer option in a ruthless totalitarian state governed by a demon in a necktie.

Does it have to be said? None of that goes well.  

He sets out then to resolve the mystery to make sure he is innocent, because all that pálinka the night before has undermined his confidence.  The fraternity brothers have ordered a case of the stuff to see if it beats Romulean blue ale.  

He romances a duchess who lives in a deuce palace with her father who disapproves of this slovenly journalist.  She and he have enough misunderstandings to quality the title as Chick Lit.  

After a while this hack realises someone is systematically plotting to bring him to ruin.  He consults the list of people who hate him compiled in the telephone book, and settles on a likely prospect, a chicken farmer whom the journalist tried in the court of pubic opinion some years ago.  

He gathers the principals in a room, and…..    

Nit picking note: the dead man was not killed in the library, ergo there was no attack in the library.  And as noted above a study with bookshelves does not a library make.  A library has to have librarians, as well as books.  

While it is set in Red Bucharest it is largely bleached of references either to communism or the regime.  How such an all enveloping miasma can be filtered out is itself a wonder.  After all, it was published in Romania by a regime that left nothing to chance.  By the way, the femme fatale is not in fact a duchess but she lives like one and that is why he calls her that. Indeed how did anyone live like that in Romania in 1983?  

George Arion with pipe.

This is the first in a series involving our hero, one Mladin, Andrei.  In 2018 Arion was still publishing a book a year.  Strength to his arm, but no more for me. 

Geekerella (2017) by Ashley Poston

GoodReads meta-data is 320 pages, rated 4.00 by 37,381 litizens.

Genre: Chick Lit.

Verdict: Ignite!

Introverted, harassed, unloved, acned, beset teenage girl dreams of the stars while her wicked stepmother and cruel step sisters torment her in a tag team.  If and when she finally snaps they will get the inheritance from the deceased father and be rid of her once and for all to live unhappily ever after.  (It’s pretty clear these people do not have the happiness gene.)

The evil step mother is certainly decanal material.  No argument, no loyalty, no evidence, no reason, no services rendered, no compassion sways her from the KPI of seeing off Introv. That way lies promotion.  Sending Introv up on the roof in a thunderstorm to fix a leak is all in a day’s meanness for her.  Nothing special.  Overdrawn just a tad, one might say.  On the other hand, speaking of deans….[some stories are not fit to print].

Introv works in a food truck with Stud Girl, a reference to the many piercings the latter sports.  They communicate in grunts.  Don’t underestimate this Newtown wannabe.   

Long ago and far away Introv had parents who loved her and took her (metaphorically) to the stars, as founding fans of StarField, a brief television series that subsequently won a following in syndication.The odes to the dead parents and the stars are humbling, moving, and spectacular to read.  If this is Chick Lit, let there be more of it.  

Meanwhile, in another world the StarField franchise is getting a re-boot these years later with a teenage Jason Bieber in the lead.*  Yuck! Nothing could be more wrong which Introv boldly declares on her blog which gets taken up far and wide simply because by some quirk of time zones she was the first to voice this opinion.    

We learn that despite appearances and expectations, this teen idol has a soul, one that yearns to be free of being Jason Bieber 24/7.  The iron cage of celebrity is very nicely realised in these pages. Though again perhaps a tiny bit overdrawn just for fun.  Still I liked the ever distracted manager and monosyllabic bodyguard.  Likewise the co-star who tells the boy wonder that if he doesn’t stand up for himself now, he never will.  

He wants out so bad he calls an old number he found for help to wiggle out of a commitment without a confrontation, which old number once belonged to Introv’s deceased dad, and so he makes unintended contact with her.  Through this mischance they communicate, and find that they can communicate more, and more easily with texts to a stranger than with anyone around them.  He is surrounded by cannibalistic fans and hangers-on; she by the equally ravenous evil step family.  

We just know that somehow these two worlds are going to meet, perhaps with a jolt, and that only these two can save each other.  

Along the way they learn (as do some others) that they are not alone.  Introv also learns that she does have friends and does not have to push the rock up the hill everyday alone.  Bieber learns to act like the hero he plays in film, just a little bit, and discovers he likes it and it works.  

Did I mention the food truck that specialised in pumpkin fries with a giant pumpkin painted on the side.  Did I mention that?  Shoulda. Did I mention Stud Girl’s cry at the gate: ‘Today we fight!’  Shoulda.  

Loved it.  

First is a series of Geek Girl books.  

*No it is not really Justin Bieber but I wanted name from the popular culture and so little do I know that I took this one to represent the ephemera, vacuity, and fatuousness thereof.  While I am sure many others fill that bill, Jason is a good fit.  

The Names of Our Tears (2013) by P. L. Gaus

The Names of Our Tears (2013) by P. L. Gaus

Genre: krimi, travelogue

GoodReads meta-data is 256 pages, rated 3.58 by 201 litizens.

Verdict: more. 

In rural north east Ohio among a largely Amish farming community, one teenage Amish girl is found shot to death.  Bad.  It was no NRA-inspired school shooting.  The bullet comes a serious organised crime handgun sanctioned by the NRA for every trigger finger.  Worse.  Crime scene tests find traces of cocaine.  Worst.  How could a sheltered Amish teenager get involved with a drug crime?  

What follows is a police procedural with emphasis on questioning those who knew her again and again and piecing together an inferential picture of what might have happened.  This is done against the background of the shock and grief of her family and friends at this ugly intrusion into their largely cocooned life.

The trail extends to Sarasota in Florida where many Amish go to winter in the off season of Ohio farming. There is quite a bit of back and forth between Ohio and Florida.   

The manners and mores of the Amish are treated with respect, as are their interactions with the sheriff who investigates and who seems to have a bottomless budget as he goes all out.  No McKinsey manager is in sight telling the sheriff to go back to writing parking fines where there is revenue flow.  

There is a side bar about an EPA investigation that allows the author through the sheriff to tweak the nose of Federal authority, but which adds nothing to the main line, though I, too enjoyed seeing the bumptious cardboard stereotype come undone.  

One the things I learned about Amish practice in this book is the daadihaus.  The dictionary defines it as a Pennsylvania Dutch (Amish) term for a granny flat near or attached to the extended family home, with the difference that is grandpa.  In practice, in this book it seemed to be a man cave where the elder male of the clan may retire in privacy to do things that might not be 100% Amish in the eyes of the local Bishop.  Though the story is tragic, it does not have a morally satisfying end, but I guess that is lifelike. 

P L Gaus

Eighth in a long running series but the first I have read. I have already acquired another for future reference.