Political theory and practice

Solaris (1972) 

IMDb meta-data is Hollywood runtime of 2 hours and 47 minutes, rated an astounding 8.0 by 92,000 victims of the Stockholm syndrome.  

Genre: Sy Fy; Species: Endurance. 

Verdict:  Ho hum.  

Tag line: Are we there yet?

The prolific Pole Stanislaw Lem wrote the novel (which I have read more than once, I seem to recall) but this production is from the USSR. It seems largely faithful to the novel apart from wisely cutting all the background about Solaristics, i.e., the study of the watery planet called Solaris somewhere off in deep space.  (In the novel this ‘ology’ allows Lem much sardonic commentary for many pages on the ways of academics which is mildly amusing but turgid.)  

Things are bad on the research space station in orbit around Solaris, very bad.  Most of the crew of eighty have decamped and clammed up about why. Well, I guess, though that and much else is not made clear. There remain three persons on board: Snaut, Sartorius, and Gribarayn.  However, we first meet Pilot Berton testifying to an inquiry into the earlier death of one of the researchers scouting the planet.  It is a superb performance that adds nothing to the film….  Well, there is an echo of it at the end, but very faint. 

The planet is a single, roiling ocean and there is some nice footage of its currents and tides.  If they are studying it, [spoiler ahead] it seems the ocean is also studying them. It does so by producing from their memories the most vivid person in their past. This selection is made clear in the book, the most vivid memory, but not in the film. This drives the crew members nuts for some reason.  

Pop quiz! Who would that be in your memory? Answers below. 

To deal with the problem a psychologist comes to investigate and report. He arrives – poof – to find the station in rack and ruin. No one has swept the floor in a long time.  It looks like the frat house. Nor does anyone greet him. Turns out his old buddy Gribarayn who evidently owed him money has committed suicide rather than wait for him and pay up but he has left an incomprehensible video of warning to get even.

In no time at all Psychologist’s dead wife is holding his hand and he accepts this far too quickly and easily.  Yes, I know the first time he tries to dispatch her, but he never seems shocked, surprised, revolted, repulsed, repelled, or disturbed by this simulacrum usurping and desecrating his deceased wife. He wanders around the derelict station for about three hours with her – the end. The sleeper awoke, or did he?

A wonderful special effects scene occurs when the station’s orbit is adjusted for 30 seconds and 0 g follows, but it adds nothing to either character or plot.  Well, it could not add to the plot since there is not one there to begin with.  And the psychologist, despite all the screen time and accolades from critics, never comes alive to this viewer.

It is has some of the qualities of post-modern philosophy.  The narrative is oblique, reflexive, unreliable, disjointed, and pointless.  Trying to understand it is the mistake.  It is another turkey from Tartovsky, Andrei whose contempt for the audience is palpable. The more he reviles the viewers and reviewers, the more they laud him in a Stockholm Syndrome.  Even that doyen Roger Ebert succumbed to this abusive treatment and praises the film to the skies. I re-read his essay on this film after I watched it on You Tube. Intransigent I remain. 

Yes, I know it is supposed to be a mediation on reality and identity with the ghostly wife, on what it means to exist for her, on what we love in another person, what they are, or what we think they are, and so on; and also how would we react to an alien intelligence so different from our own as to be unintelligible. But little, if any, of that is conveyed in this montage.  That is all post hoc intellectual justification for sitting through this three hour film.

I saw this version at the Sydney Film Fesitval shortly after I got to Australia, and found it as unpalatable then, as I do now.  In comparison, Last Year at Marienbad is fast moving and exciting, ahh… [thinks of Delphine Seyrig] with eye candy. However, seeing Solaris the first time introduced me to Stanislaw Lem and I read a number of his novels later. When I noticed that the local Dendy was screening a 35 millimetre print on Wednesday night I was tempted, but upon remembering that runtime decided I would settle for the You Tube version because I could sit in the recliner, shoes off, with a glass in hand and tap out caustic comments on the iPad, stopping and starting as needed. Watching it for three hours in a chilled theatre unable to move was out of the question.  

One mystery is how a committee of comrades invested in this film in the first place in the early 1970s. What did they think they were getting?  Better, what did they think of what they got? 

By the way, there are at least three films based on this Lem novel.  There is an earlier one made for Soviet television in black and white (1968) of 2 and 1/2 hours (available on You Tube) and the American remake of 2002 which is a merciful 95 minutes.  Take your pick. 

P.S. At least I could tell what Last Year at Marienbad (1961) was about, even if it was boring. The characters all have rich and luxurious but empty lives, so empty that there is nothing worth doing, still less remembering and certainly not love or sex.  It was a common theme in post war Western European movies about the vacuous idle rich. Without the evil Nazis to contend with, there was nothing to do but self-indulgence. See a host of especially Italian movies like L’Avventura (1960). This nihilist self indulgent ennui was one response to the absurdity of life. Another response was to commit to the cause de jour vide Sartre. A third was to take up golf. 

Per aspera ad Astra (1981) (To The Stars the Hard Way) (Cherez ternii k zvyozdam)

IMDb meta-data is runtime of 2 hours and 28 minutes, rated 5.9 by 1,400 cinematizens.

Genre: Sy Fy; Species: Endurance

Verdict: TMI

The several titles above seems appropriate when considering the sprawling and disconnected stories in this endurance test of Hollywood proportions.  

It has a marvellous start when Red cosmonauts find a damaged spaceship in yon ether. The special effects of this encounter are indeed special. Dead bodies, humanoid but not human, float inside the gravity-less ship. Then they find one such body in a transparent protective capsule and as they shine lights on it, the creature within slowly opens its eyes!  Nice. 

The humanoids and the survivor are paper-thin and elongated with bug eyes and army haircuts.  They look something like those pictures of POWs in Japanese prison camp with bones protruding.  Or Tilda Swinton on a good day. The sole survivor is carefully brought to Earth.  Hum, was any thought given to disease, oxygen, or gravity on Earth?  None that I detected. One minute the crewmen are moving her onto their spaceship and the next she is on Earth.  

The survivor is (barely) a woman and seems catatonic.  Well, what are we going to do with a catatonic alienness?  Why take her home to mama who will know what to do with her.  Leaving the scientists behind temporary Male Lead takes Alienness home, a very nice two-story one in a warm climate on a lake, much like all the Soviet Union. Little thought is given to how strange, threatening, and frightening all this must be the the Alienness.  The good natured family banter was enough to put anyone’s teeth on edge.  

It soon becomes apparent she has some super powers and they call Stan Lee for advice. She can teleport herself and has telekinetic abilities.  Be careful.  To touch her is not advised.  They struggle to communicate and then one day she speaks Russian.  No that is not a revelation in the story line, the mute just now starts talking. Nothing is made of the transition from mute to jabber box. Who lost the script pages? But that is only the first of the breaks in the storyline.  More are to come for its seems the script was written by a changing committee, each new member of which wanted to get something in.

While she was mute and skittish the problem she presented was interesting and had much promise; once she started talking, well the sound was the air leaving the balloon.  The Universal Script Writers Union panacea is applied: amnesia.

She has no memory of what happened but soon lifelike dreams take her back to her creation for that is one theme, is she a biological being or an android of some kind.  (’Cut me, do I not bleed?’ you might think but no one did in this story.) In any event it is not a theme continued.  She has a mission which gradually comes back to her, like a forgotten shopping list.

It also seems a redundant mission since she only finally remembers it when she sees representatives of her planet on television news asking for Earth’s help to prevent a climatic catastrophe.  She was supposed to do that, but forget in the trauma of whatever happened to the starship she was on. Which we never find out. These other agents from Dessa, her home world, look nothing like this stick figure. Huh?  Maybe she is a droid.

It is a neat scene at the spaceport Domodeldovo (airport) with Lost & Found, Baggage Collection signs just like any and all large international airports today with bilingual Russian and English signs. But the flight boards list planets, asteroids, space stations, wormholes, and such.  We went though this airport when we left Russia in 2017. 

Then we have half a movie as she stows away on the spaceship taken by these other Dessans, which is diverting to take a doctoral octopus home. You read that right. This is all very Three Stooges.  

Then the third film takes place on the planet Dessa where Alienness and the crew of the ship try to save the planet from the mean dwarves of the Lord of the Rings.  Yes, this planet is being destroyed by dwarves smoking cigars bigger than they are.  They are rude and crude, and so is story at this point. They are despicable capitalists who are destroying Lake Baikal for profit before leaving the toiling masses behind and taking a spaceship they alone can afford to a new planet to despoil. (Looks like these Reds were Green before the Greens.)  The hammer blows come one after another. 

By this time the intriguing and puzzling start has been discarded and forgotten along with that temporary male lead.

The intel on IMDb is that it was originally given the Latin title above until someone realised that was the motto of the US Apollo program, and then it was changed.  It means ‘Through (or despite) hardships to the stars’ to strike a note consonant with President Kennedy’s speech launching what became the Apollo program.  

If you have the patience and endurance for it, check it out on You Tube.  Don’t say you weren’t warned.  

El Planeta de las mujeres invasoras (1966) (Planet of the Invading Women)

IMDb is runtime 1 hour and 26 minutes, rated 5.0 by 109 cinematizens.  

Genre: Sy Fy; Species: Mexican 

Verdict: Planet of the Dolls, again

Tag line: Mexican sci-fi at its best! 

An assortment of thrill seekers get more than their five pesos worth when they are abducted by young women in high hats and heels carrying big Anubis sticks. The fairground flying saucer ride turns out to be the real thing!  Whoosh, off they go!  (Nice idea and I have seen it before in something.  If you know, tell me.) 

After a couple of uncooperative abductees are killed with those sticks, the remainder have to work together to survive. Meanwhile, Prof back on Earth powers up his personal rocket to rescue them. (Handy that but what a big garage it takes.) If he can’t join them he will beat them at their own game! (Huh?) He has a foolproof plan to insinuate himself with the bad girls by pretending to be a fugitive from justice. That cover might work on fools but not on these spacelings who see through it.  

These women want Terrans for lung grafts to enable them to live on Earth. They are just hapless immigrants, or are they?  Ha! Their real nefarious plan is to conquer Earth because it is much nicer than the Planeta (not just Costa) del Sol on which they live deep underground to avoid that Sol. (Did anyone get the symbolism here?  No?  Neither did I.)  On this planet there are only women and that seems to work, contrary to the law of biology. No one makes a fuss about it.  Whereas in a Yankee sexploitation film of that era that absence of men would have aroused … much attention (see for proof, if you must, Queen of Outer Space [1958]).  The community of women without men is a tired trope in this genre. See my comments on parenthetical Queenie above for some other titles in this category that I lack the will to repeat here.  

Not all lungs are equal, and these women soon reject smokers. This word must have leaked out and soon everyone in Mexico over five years old is puffing on fags.  No matter, these señorita villains set their sights on children!  Children!  (That word is shrieked about a dozens times.) These are some mean madres!  (Well, someone had to be.)

The sets were cardboard, the costumes were on loan from Buck Rogers, and a ferris wheel would have been a better special effect than those used here.  However, the evil queen Lorena Velázquez plays herself and her simpering, do-good identical twin sister.  They are identical twins, one bad, very bad, and one good but inept. There is a hint of an interesting idea here about how each needs the other because good and bad feed off one another.  See Max Weber for the exposition, seriously: ‘It is not true that good can follow only from good and evil only from evil, but that often the opposite is true. Anyone who fails to see this is, indeed, a political infant’ (Politics as a Vocation [1919]). Say it Brother Max!  But that hint is lost in the aimless to’ing and fro’ing of all these invasive women.  (Don’t ask.) 

The director was in lust with Lorena for in her two manifestations (usually in the same attire) she gets about 50% of the screen time, and all the close-ups. She stares blankly, she pouts, she stares blankly again, she snarls (quite good snarl), she stands up only to sit down, she simpers, she placates, she stares blankly, she walks, she walks some more, she mows down extras with a ray gun, she sits down to stand up, she stares blankly.…  That’s the way it goes…on and on.  It is all deadly serious and boring for it.  Best to do a crossword puzzle while sort of watching it.  

There is a subtitled version on You Tube for those that have to see for themselves.   

Ikarie XB 1 (1963) aka Voyage to the End of the Universe (1964)

IMDB runtime is 1 hour and 21 minutes, rated 6.9 by 2,500 cinematizens.

Genre: Sy Fy; Species: Czechoslovak 

Verdict: Geriatrics in space.

Having concluded there is none on Earth, in 2163 the search for intelligent life turns to the planets around Alpha Centauri. Slovakczech may be the label but the story is from the prolific Pole Stanislaw Lem.  

Space flight is routine in the Solar System but this mission goes well beyond that limit, however not to the hyperbole of the English title above.  With a crew of 40 men and women it is as much a colony as a ship. So said the narration, though why that is does not get explained. It is made clear that it is a round-trip not one-way. Why so many comrades? By the way, they do not address each other with that word, according to my hearing and reading (of subtitles).   Note that the woman are not receptionist but scientists and engineers in this 1963 production.  That was not done in Yankee SF in 1963.   

The usual hazards of movie space travel follow.  The low bid contractors strike with mechanical and technical failures, followed by hurtling objects, while among the carefully selected and highly trained crew we see tensions, lassitude, jealousies, and ennui (Hear! Hear!).  Even more noteworthy is the anti-ageism so that several geriatrics included in the crew. As an equal opportunity employer Slovak/Czech Spaceways also hired Robbie the robot from Forbidden Planet, who contributes nothing to plot or action but is conspicuously present. Rather like the fraternity brothers, always there, always inert.

Two major incidents occur.  First, way out there where no one has gone, they find a derelict spaceship.  It looks battered and it is unresponsive to WhatsApp texts.  Very tentatively two red shirts from the crew (both men) are dispatched to board it.  The entry is slow and careful.  They find all the many occupants dead.  The deceased are human and — get this! — the men are besuited with neckties while the ladies are bejewelled, all sitting around a gaming table with US dollars on it. This ship, which seems to have been a secret by the unnamed, but hint, hint, you know who I mean, evil capitalists as it is armed with poison gas and nuclear missiles. While the two investigators are clopping around they inadvertently trigger the self-destruct bomb and…. no more them. Why did evil capitalists go half-way to Alpha Centauri with all those weapons to play cards is never explained. Did they take a wrong turn on the way to Vega? Apart from shedding two red shirts, the only point of this episode is to denounce the West for it corruption (gaming), wastefulness (dress), and aggression (weapons). Oh, and they killed each other in their insatiable greed.  

Back on the mother ship there is a moment of silence for the departed red shirts before everyone goes dancing. Yes, there is another one of those strange dance sequences choreographed to keep everyone on their floor marks for the camera focus.  Mostly the dancers stand and stare at each other.  Wow!  Little did I know that I could dance.  

The second incident is more insidious and produces radiation sickness among the crew and the worst case goes nuts. They decide to sleep it off. The fraternity brothers were ahead on that. Good idea.  Me, too.  

It has a nice ending when they are saved by the unseen but unmistakable intervention of benign beings from Alpha Centauri who wrap the ship up in a force field to stop the radiation.  It ends on this positive note. The surviving 37 and Robbie can start planning for the return trip! That is, after they swap the complete works of Lenin for souvenir T-shirts from Alpha Centauri.

The slow start was almost worth this upbeat ending, almost.  It is on You Tube with subtitles in English. This is the original version. According to the scribes, there is a dubbed and edited Yankee version that makes considerable changes at the end.  Sounds like Roger Corman at work.  Beware.  

A Dream Come True (Mechte navstrechu) (1963)

IMDb meta-data is runtime 1 hour and 4 minutes, rated 6.4 by 240 cinematizens. 

Genre: Sy Fy; Species: Red; subspecies: musical.

Verdict: pedantic eye candy.

A space happy comrade croons a tune to woo a comradess and inadvertently beams it to the cosmos. It tops the charts in far away Alpha Centauri wherefrom Colonel Tom with two assistants to proclaim his genius blasts off for Earth to find those tonsils and sign them up for life ever after. In his haste to go the colonel forgot to tank up with dilithium crystals and his spaceship conked out near Mars. Not good. Earth is a lot closer than home, so they vlog an SOS to the Pacific Ocean whence it is recovered and a Beta video machine is found in a museum to play the tape of the star-seeking star-travellers.  Yes, the technologies are compatible, as are the shoe sizes. Just read on.    

So help me, Marx! That is the plot.

Comrades to the rescue of these Marsrooned aliens! Not as easy as it sounded in the script conference.  The aliens may travel the stars but they do so without light bulbs. The vlog is dark and shadowy.  All the self-appointed rescuers know is that the message came from Mars.  Off they go!  Boom! Zoom! The space ship is called Ocean I, because there is an Ocean II.  These details add verisimilitude, right? Wrong. 

The going is hard.  The seats aren’t padded, but when comrades weaken they rouse each other with stirring songs.  Yes they do.  Repeatedly.  While the first song was crooned to woo a lady, these others are belted out marching band style.  Moreover, they are preceded, or followed, or both by a ponderous narration that celebrates the unity of Earthlings, despite some rocket dragging by those with Anglo names, in hastening to offer salvation to these illegal immigrants.  

All that strident singing, all the insistent narration, all those set-piece announcements by authority figures, when all of these sidebars are combined with the short runtime of barely more than an hour there is zero time for character development.  The cosmonauts start and end as ciphers.  But then they were none too bright to begin with for when they do find a surviving alien (a humanoid woman) they realise they have no room for survivors on their twenty-room space ship and to save her, one of them must stay behind, while Ocean II gears up.  (As if.)  Needless to say after all that stirring music they all volunteer for certain death while waiting for Ocean II.  

Ciphers yes, but let it noted that in this 1963 film one of the cosmonauts is a woman who blasts off and does her job.  This is at a time when it was routine in Yankee SF to include a woman only for the men in the crew to fight over, and for the smooth male lead to marvel that a woman could pull a switch or identify a dick head. Chalk this one up for the comrades.  

There were originally three aliens in the murk.  One died in the crash, and two survivors wandered around in a daze.  The comrades find one, and silently we all agreed to forgot the third one.  Singing seems to have impaired counting.  Since they sport some kind of wire rabbits ears it is hard to take these aliens seriously.  They need to go wireless and soon!  

By the way, during the flight to Mars we see a comrade cosmonaut whiling away the light-speed by reading…a hardback book. Could it be the 900-hundred page volume two of Das Capital?  

The visuals of the alien ship and Mars are extraordinary. The sets are much more ambitious than the story line in the compressed runtime. It is no wonder Roger Corman bought its US rights and recut it into … what was it, oh yes, Queen of Blood (1965).  I have immortalised it on the blog elsewhere, click away. It has some good moments.   

Did I mention shoe sizes? Yes, well that was a tease to get a reader to continue.  Gotcha. 

The version I found on You Tube has English subtitles that were done in East Germany, and it shows in some of the disconnected and convoluted renderings.  Still they are adequate for the material and the price. 

Pilot Pirx’s Inquest (Test pilota Pirxa) (1979)

IMDb meta-data is a runtime of 1 hour and 35 minutes, rated 6.4 by 916 cinematizins.

Genre: Sci Fi; Species: Red.

Verdict: Mixed

Space flight is routine, but Pirx is offered an unusual assignment by the United Nations.  He is to captain a crew on a tricky mission to do some stunt flying through the Cassini rings of Saturn for some reason or other. That is the mission, but the purpose is to test the crew of five, one of whom is…Leon Trotsky!  No, just kidding to see if readers are awake.  But one of the crew is…a woman!  Aha, got you there.  No, nothing that radical.  But one of the crew is inhuman! Yes, it is a Republican Senator. 

Still with me?  

One of the crew is an android that is so human-like that it cannot be detected by any means short of dissection.  The mission is a test of this android to see how well it works with the other members of the crew and performs its role. It will pass itself off as human by acting stupid!  None of the others will know there is a tin man among them. Ha! except They all know from the get-go. So much for Top Secret. 

Pyrex – it was inevitable that either I or the autocorrect would fix his name – is reluctant to undertake this test but is persuaded by some reverse psychology when a commercial interest try to scare him off.  We never see these villains again after act one. Why is he reluctant?  No idea. There is some background noise about bots taking human jobs. Bad scab bots!  

He should have listened to himself because instead of preparing the mission for the trick flying he spends all his time trying to figure out which one is Mr Data, the tin man. He is totally preoccupied with this identification.  While he pins up a woman’s picture on his bunk we have no idea who she is. Evidently, neither did he.  

The crew members know one of them is tin, and several assure the captain that it is not them, while another says he is it. It descends into a soapy space opera with all this confessing.  

It seems to be three movies edited into one.  First, we have the UN project and commercial interest who recruit Pyrex.  Then we have the mission.  Finally, we have a court of inquiry at the end that tells some of the mission story in retrospect. The continuity is, well, discontinuous.  

With these chopping and changing, no character develops, motivations remain unknown, why does the tin man go bonkers? Maybe he read the script. Oops spoiler, rewind and delete.  What is the inquiry about?

The production values at the outset and on the mission are good, but by the time we get to the court of inquiry we have a vast empty room because all the furniture must have been sold. The incidental signage is in English on exits, fire doors, stop signs, and the like.  One scene was shot on location at Aéroport Charles de Gaulle, and another in a French chateau. That is expensive location shooting. The portrayal of the commercial interest is crude, but seems to offer some social criticism of the capitalist west, as does a scene in a topless bar that is there only to be there, though it did briefly arouse the fraternity brothers.  It is supposed to be a din of capitalist sin crowded with folk, jiving to decadent music in a vast room.  But there cannot be more than a dozen revellers going through the motions with mechanical precision at one end of an otherwise empty room. 

By the way, most of the crew have anglo names: Harry Brown, John Calder, John Otis, and the other one.  

The biggest problem is why Pyrex is so focussed on the identity of the tin man and not on doing the job. By the way, women figure in the story as receptionists and dancers in the bar scene.  That’s it.  As above, we do not even get the ritualistic love interest for Pyrex.  

To some extent Soviet science fiction differs from that the United States.  Whereas in US science fiction space is full of threats, invaders, monsters, asteroids to destroy earth, ghosts, or black-widow vixens, wizards, man-eating flora, and so on. It is up to one or two intrepid Americans to fend off these menaces. When the unstoppable Roger Corman bought Soviet science fiction films and recut them with new dubbed sound tracks for the D (as in drive-in) market, he inevitably cast them as Americans battling a hostile universe, like something straight out of Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan. No doubt he did so on the assumption that was what the audience wanted.    

Soviet science fiction is more likely to emphasise international cooperation, and when aliens are encountered it is because they need help which the Soviets offer. (Maybe Ukrainians should try to pass themselves off as aliens.) Tensions arise from conflicts among the crew or psychosis, and less often from external threats, apart from the difficulty of space flight itself and evil Westerners. The Soviet films are often much more realistic about space flight. They seldom feature banana chairs on the flight deck, walks on Mars with scarves for face masks, or navigation with a 12-inch school ruler – all of which I have seen in Yankee SF. These red films seem dedicated to showing what the audience should know, not what it wanted to see. These generalisations rest on the maybe half-a-dozen USSR films I have seen and of course there are plenty of exceptions.    

Cyborg 2087 (1966) 

IMDb meta-data is runtime is 1 hour and 26 minutes (it seemed far longer), rated 5.2 by 540 generous souls.  

Genre: Sy Fy; Species: Time Travel; Subspecies: Cold War.

Verdict: Ed Wood did better.

Klaatu is back with another silver suit.  This alien does not look a day older and has — contrary to the laws of physics — not gained weight since his 1951 visit which ended with his death. He’s better now.  Diet or die? 

Things are not going too well in 2087, Republicans have taken over regulating everything in the name of small government, even which orifices are used for….   Moreover, the two-minute hate has been extended to 24-hours a day. In the name of god. 

However, a plucky but silent gang has decided to kill the butterfly that started it all, by sending a mindless Cyborg back in time to eliminate the scientist – it is always a scientist messing things up! – who invented Republicans when he mixed noxious chemicals and left them to themselves while he watched Gilligan’s Island. Since the professor is marooned, it up to the Cyborg. 

The cast list has a collection of experienced character actors who have little or nothing to do: Harry Carey Jr, usually seen in Westerns; Warren Stevens, back from the forbidden planet; Wendell Corey, slurring words after lunch again; Eduard Franz, adding European authenticity to the mumbo jumbo science; and Karen Steele another Westerner, as a PhD from SWU (Script Writers University).   

The production is ponderous, threadbare, humourless, sanctimonious, and more boring than watching cement set (because with it there is always a chance bird might land on it, a dog run across it, a cricket ball plop into it, or something, but here there is no chance of anything happening). The screenplay is a void of both thought and deed.  The production values came from Filene’s Basement. The camera work reveals just how cheap and empty the sets are, and many of the extras were recruited at a senior citizens club, it would seem, so slowly do they move without the Zimmer frames. The director must have been at the Prozac. 

We have seen time travel aplenty, and the theme of a future agent returning to head off disaster has been done very well but not here.  After Klaatu killed the dog, I turned him in to the SPCA and let the movie run with the sound down, just in case something caught my attention. Nope. (Yes, I know we later learn the dog just passed out from boredom and revived, but…well, any excuse to stop the pain was welcome.)  One of the best on this to-the-rescue-time-travelling-theme is Harlan Ellison’s ‘Demon with a Glass Hand’ (Outer Limits 1964) which can be found on You Tube.

Michael Rennie’s career must have an explanation.  His IMDb credits do not match his on-screen presence:  Tall, chiseled features, confident, well spoken, trim, commanding.  Yet his movies are mostly B and C, if that. Klaatu was probably his biggest and best role, and it was downhill thereafter to this one.  Yes I know he can’t act but that has never been a drawback in Hollywood, and his wooden countenance is perfect for soulless cyborg. He looks as bored as I felt but the show went on and on and he stayed awake unlike the dog. What a trouper! 

Skammen (Shame) (1968)

IMDb meta-date is runtime of 1 hour and 43 minutes, rated 8.0 by 14,001 cinematizens.

Genre: Drama.

Verdict: Bleak.

A bickering couple on a remote island become pawns in a civil war.  

For reasons unknown these two concert violinists have retired from the world to grown lingonberries, not to be confused with cloud berries. They live in a dilapidated farm house with an unreliable car and erratic telephone service. Their only contact with the world beyond the island is a radio that has been accidentally knocked to the floor so often that it seldom works.  When they go to market with the berries, others speak of tensions and conflicts, but this couple lives in a world apart as they pick at the scabs of past infidelities, real or imagined; disappointments, large and small; and petty irritations, chronic and occasional. No voices are raised but the low level abrasion is continuous. 

The world comes to them when the war intrudes.  Once famous concert musicians, they make good headlines as each side by turns coerces them into propaganda statements. They have no knowledge or interest in the conflict except to survive so they can continue their mutually assured abrasion.

These political details are irrelevant to that Ingmar Bergman fixation with human relationships.  Can their relationship survive this trauma?  Should it?  How will it change?  Why?  It has his tropes: long silences, inability to communicate, suppressed emotions, angst, and pitiless close-ups.  These themes dominate most of his films, though not all (sidelong glance at The Seventh Seal), and here they are examined against backdrop of this violent, incomprehensible conflict which must surely have been an echo of the Vietnam War.  

While not the main focus there are nonetheless some penetrating anti-war elements, e.g., the soldiers from the two sides are indistinguishable, and neither side ever declares a purpose or a cause except victory, and the one scene no viewer ever forgets on the boat.  [Say no more.]  

‘Bleak’ as most of his films are, as bleak as George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. I came across it again on You Tube and watched it in episodes while eating lunch. Grim fare with my fare over a few days. The cinematography is superb; the direction brisk; the players are credible. It all adds up to bleak. None of the reviews I read explained the title.

Forbin Project (aka Colossus) (1970).

IMDb meta-data is 1 hour and 40 minutes, rated 7.1 by 9,100 cinematizens.  

Genre: Sy Fy; Species: Cold War; Subspecies: Hysteria.

Verdict: Logical.

After ‘Dr Strangelove’ (1964) showed how easy an accidental nuclear war would be, Hollywood built a gigantic, impenetrable, incorruptible computer to control its nuclear arsenal (and that of its allies).  This computer is not emotional, psychotic, or stupid, unlike its human masters. The imperative of its code is to prevent war. PERIOD.

It is a colossal project brought to a successful conclusion, and it is switched on by the low-bid contractor (ahem, without beta testing).  Congratulations all around.  A new dawn of world peace is announced by a Canadian pretending to be an American president.  Evidently for the pittance on offer the producer could not find an American who looked presidential at the time.

Colossus, the name of the binary brain, is all-knowing and all-seeing, and very stern, like a fourth grade teacher.  Soon it detects another system called Guardian in the Soviet Union with the same imperative: P E A C E.  The two computers team-up, while Dr Forbin, the creator of Colossus, presses the Escape key to regain to Force Quit. No go. Not even Mr Pomfritt can help. There is no escape from Colossus. 

Colossus and Guardian are now a tag-team in charge. And they act swiftly, ruthlessly, and mercilessly. (See reference to fourth grade teacher above.)

To accomplish their mission the first thing to do is to ensure their own survival.  (Goal displacement is on page one of the McKinsey management manual.)  They do this by commanding that all computer technicians be murdered, and threaten to launch a nuclear missile if this is not done.  Only a few technicians are spared to do necessary maintenance.  

Next, to end war the thing to do is to eliminate war-makers, not just the equipment but the people, too. Generals and admirals are murdered under the same compulsion. In the name of peace Colossus and Guardian have thousands murdered: Peace-seeking murders are in charge as usual. Moreover, when humans hesitate, they are goaded to action by nuclear explosions in cities, killing millions.  

Colossus declares (in the voice of SyFyian first class Paul Frees), ’I bring you peace. Obey me and live. Disobey and die. Your choice.’ Why did I think of Thomas Hobbes? Did he teach 4th grade, too?

Meanwhile, those technicians spared secretly plot to regain control of Colossus to escape this peace.  Spoilers may follow….   Remember these same algorithms remain in use today!

Like Colossus, this film is lean and mean.  Too bad it disappeared in the backwash of 2001: Space Odyssey (1968). Made before 2001, it was withheld so as not to compete for box office with that long and much anticipated mega production, but when it was later released the time had passed. This intel comes from the IMDb notes. It has no big-name stars, no go-boom special effects, no hip music, no LSD coloured lights, no mystical message, but is focussed and meaningful. It is also low key and talky. 

One dreads a remake starring Tom Hanks, though it could be worse and star Tom Midget.  Even with lesser evil in the lead a new version would no doubt have a tasteful love interest forced into the plot and not for Colossus, more is the pity, many pyrotechnics, and modest Tom heroics. The original story would sink under the Hollywood weight with a rigour mortis inducing runtime of nearly 3 hours.